Mar 8, 2013 10:04:12 PM cite

"sustainabilty and efficency can not exist in a supply and demand economy" Meaning we already have the technology to solve many of the worlds problems including hunger the only thing in the way is it is less profitable to solve problems then to "treat" them.

by Elle15

Oct 4, 2010 4:10:13 AM cite

People are under the control of their governments and the system their abilities or inabilities create. While there can be situations where other people and countries can help the country and it's people they must learn to develop to help themselves and their situation. We get bombarded by heart wrenching pictures of people starving and wars but we don't get bombarded by what the leaders are living like and where all the money is going which is the real issue as it's not going to feeding people and making them capable it's coming right back to rich and developed countries who are selling overpriced weapons to both sides.

by jshm2

Sep 3, 2010 10:05:15 AM cite

if somehow we find a way to profit off of helping people in need then we will but until then people will remain in oppression. it is so sad how our world is run by money and greed.

by adan

Sep 1, 2010 9:23:25 PM cite

The major world powers know that the natural resources of this planet are limited, therefore, to maintain their status for longer life, it is necessary to sacrifice other people´s life. Horrible.

by chynt

Aug 31, 2010 2:16:08 PM cite

Because someone consumes more than their needs And therefore others suffer from a lack

by Maryam

Aug 27, 2010 9:26:59 PM cite

yeah, popluation control in part of the government. maybe if they(the government) knew better how to manage the resources that the earth provides we can all be feed. or lleaving it to each individual instead of controlling it. I mean they overuse a piece of land that is not even in "their" territory to harvest ,as an example, potatoe, so they can ship it to a distant land. In many times that overused piece of land if not well used it will not keep producing what it produce in a beginnind cause of the depletion of minerals, nutrients in the soil, eventually uncapable of producing anything. what now? find another land thats not all ready overused? on and on. Thats what their doing. Yeah maybe that piece of land eventually in some or many years could be fertil again, but what about how that little change multipled by every land that is used in the same way affecting the "healthy" lands or ecosystem in a global scale? Another thought was on population control some mentioned before, wouldnt more food eventually lead to maybe less population atleast in the developing countries? im thinking more food less sex drive cause they wont have so much pressure as they do now to stay alive, so being more comfortable would lead to less intercourse. They wouldnt need to be thinking on more hands to help recollect sufficient food to keep themselves alive.

by nikina

Jun 14, 2010 12:31:35 PM cite

Locking up the food, and destroying the individuals means of producing food or living self sufficiently, is how militant corporate superpowers enslave the people of developing nations, and exploit them for labor and natural resources. Ultimately if all the elements necessary for human survival are owned by a few entities, all others who want to live will owe them for that opportunity. More food, more people. Hunger is a mechanism of control.

by DEATHFROM ABOVE

Jun 14, 2010 4:19:33 AM cite

Because them are not "we".

by elartista

Jun 1, 2010 4:17:36 AM cite

the sad thing about that is, we do. the people who can afford it, waste it. and even if we did produce enough food for the ENTIRE human race to live off of and waste some also, there would be no resources left. the human race is so enormous that the entire earth would be dead and gone by now if everyone got what they wanted to needed.

by lostinthought

May 26, 2010 1:28:19 PM cite

If someone would ask me that question I would answer: I personally do not contribute to feeding all hungry people. Because I do not feel their pain and hunger. I do not feel it because my connection and love for all of mankind (therefor also the ones who are hungry) is little. If they needed my help, on a more fundamental and deeper level. A spiritual level, they would get it. I would feel them. But they don't, the despair of others doesn't do anything to me. Only the love and attention others give makes me perform any action. I am sure I once had a life in which I suffered from starvation, It's not like thats the end of your soul. It only makes you stronger.

by Luuk1992

May 24, 2010 4:46:19 PM cite

Nothing good would come from feeding everyone in the world. Yes the logistics would not work but feeding everyone in the world would have the same detrimental affect food aid has had in Africa. I recommend Dead Aid by Dambisa Moyo. The real solution is in the empowerment of women, through education and internal changes in the way a society thinks. Other than charities like Oxfam we could try building giant libraries in third world countries and just leaving the doors open. Think.

by Halite

May 15, 2010 3:49:34 PM cite

Think back to Economics 101....the problem of distribution. We can grow tons of food, but getting it to where it needs to be is the hard part.

by billsmith

Apr 6, 2010 1:09:17 AM cite

People need to care and share. And not only share our excess food but also share the wealth of knowledge and resources that all may provide their own food. Anything less shows the greed and apathy of the people behind the world systems.

by Artist Awakening

Mar 28, 2010 5:05:31 AM cite

The poorest Indians live on the richest places in India. They live in places where the eyes of the MNCs, mining corporations and obviously the Indian Govt. are set on..

by goksnair

Mar 28, 2010 5:05:24 AM cite

The poorest Indians live on the richest places in India. They live in places where the eyes of the MNCs, mining corporations and obviously the Indian Govt. are set on..

by goksnair