Jun 11, 2010 11:24:17 PM cite

The reason I ask this is because logic seems to paint god out to be objective. If god is omnipotent/present, then it is basically everything. So if it's everything then it can't change, as it's already every change that could possibly happen. If something can't react to change, then it probably isn't subjective right? So it seems to me that god would be the total object. The only problem with this god is that it isn't very romantic, purposefully speaking. But it could be a fallacy to say that god is subject to needing a purpose like humans, which, in that case, human purpose is meaningless outside the human paradigms. I'm ready to admit that may be true, but I still honestly think there's some way for us to rationalize god as a subjective being. Anyways, it would be nice to hear some other thoughts on this.

by sheisty